$4.84 to $5.54B Qualcomm Mobile Phone Lawsuit

0
164

An estimated $4.84 to $5.54 billion settlement expected in the class action lawsuit entitled In re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation, aka Qualcomm Mobile Phone Lawsuit.

Qualcomm Mobile Phone Lawsuit

Class members in the case claim that they were charged higher prices then they should have for cell phones based on the inflated costs of the modem chipsets by Qualcomm.

Class members also contend that Qualcomm participated in anticompetitive behavior as part of the antitrust litigation that is still pending.

In re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation was filed in April 2017.

Who should file a claim?

Class members include anyone in the U.S. who purchased UMTS, CDMA and/or LTE cell phones for personal use from Feb. 11, 2011, from providers such as Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, or Sprint and were manufactured by companies such as Apple, Samsung, LG Motorola, and ZTE.

Claim forms are not being collected at this time.

PLEASE NOTE IF YOU DO NOT QUALIFY FOR A SETTLEMENT DO NOT FILE A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT CLAIM.

Not only are you filing claims under penalty of perjury but you are also harming other eligible class members if you submit a fraudulent claim.

If you do not qualify for this settlement check out our list of No Proof Required Class Action Lawsuit Settlements.

Proof of purchase required?

No proof of purchase has been determined at this time.

Qualcomm Mobile Phone Lawsuit Important Dates

  • Mar. 22, 2019 – Exclusion Deadline
  • September 2018 – Class Certification Approved

Don’t Qualify for the Qualcomm Mobile Phone Lawsuit?

Check out these settlements instead:

Qualcomm Mobile Phone Lawsuit Contact Points

Exclusion Mailing Address – Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation EXCLUSIONS, P.O. Box 173001, Milwaukee, WI 53217

In re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation is listed as case number 5:17-md-02773-LHK and is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Class members in the case will be represented by Kalpana Srinivasan, Marc M. Seltzer, Steven G. Sklaver, Amanda K. Bonn, Oleg Elkhunovich, Krysta Kauble Pachman, Chelsea Samuels, and Catriona Lavery from the law firm of Susman Godfrey LLP, Joseph W. Cotchett, Adam J. Zapala, Mark F. Ram, and Michael A. Montaño from the law firm of Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy LLP, and Steve W. Berman, Jeffrey D. Friedman, and Rio S. Pierce from the law firm Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP.

Qualcomm will be represented by Robert A. Van Nest, Eugene M. Paige, Cody S. Harris, Justina Sessions, and Jesselyn Friley from the law firm of Keker Van Nest & Peters LLP, Gary A. Bornstein and Yonatan Even from the law firm of Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP, and Willard K. Tom, Richard Taffet, and Geoffrey T. Holtz from the law firm of Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP.

Qualcomm Mobile Phone Lawsuit Website

www.MobilePhoneClassAction.com

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here